[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7)

From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:58:49 -0600

7). In Section 3.7:
It is not clear to whom this procedure applies. If it meant to apply
to IANA, then it seems to contradict IETF agreement with IANA as
specified in RFC 2860.


It applies to the maintaining authority defined in the RFC that
establishes the extension.  This is described unambiguously, though
perhaps not with maximum clarity, in Section 3.7.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html

http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #54: section 3.7 requirements on maintainers of additional registries (Apps #7)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.