[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #51: MAY in 2.2.4 (E) on Channel Islands (Apps #4)



[as a technical contributor]

As a statement that something with regards to the registry is possible, it seems very appropriate to me that this is a MAY, in the RFC 2119 sense.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2009/05/25 7:56, Doug Ewell wrote:
4). In Section 2.2.4:
Why is this a MAY?
I.e., should this be registered or not?

It may be registered if someone requests it through the normal, uh,
channels. (As a technical contributor, I think doing so would be a
mistake.) It is almost certainly not an RFC 2119 MAY, but just a
statement that something is possible.

--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.