Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6)

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6)
...
> I would suggest, in place of Randy's proposal, the following replacement text:
> 
> --
>        Script subtags consist of four letters and were defined according
>        to [ISO15924] ("Codes for the representation of the names of
>        scripts: alpha-4 script codes"), or subsequently assigned by the
>        ISO 15924 registration authority or governing standardization
>        bodies. Script subtags denote the script or writing system used in conjunction
>        with this language.
> --

As a technical contributor...

(1) I don't find the parenthetic material helpful.
(2) I have a problem with "denote *the* script".  "denote *a* script"
    would be fine with me.
(3) I assume your omission of "Only codes assigned by ISO
    15924 will be considered for registration." was unintentional,
    since dropping that sentence would seem to be a technical change
    from the I-D that was last-called.

Randy