Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)

["Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>]

On 2009/05/27 10:06, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> Well then somebody ;-) decide that the consensus

[chair hat on]

On the comments received recently (issues 48-54), I plan to evaluate 
consensus in the next few days. However, I'd appreciate if there were 
more people contributing to the technical discussion or expressing their 
preferences (please do so on each issue separately!).


> is to remove it and let's be done with it. But at this particular point in the document's development (after after last call), I tend to be allergic to changes, especially ones that a) have never hurt in the past and b) apparently don't hurt anything.

I agree, except that these comments come from our AD (or via our AD, 
which is essentially the same).

[chair hat off]
We may as well agree with this one, which is harmless, so that the 
commenter feels s/he achieved something :-).

Regards,   Martin.

> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Lab126
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:19 PM
> > To: LTRU Working Group
> > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps
> > #5)
> >
> > Hi -
> >
> > > From: "Phillips, Addison"<addison at amazon.com>
> > > To: "Randy Presuhn"<randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working
> > Group"<ltru at ietf.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:41 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps
> > #5)
> > > > As a technical contributor...
> > > >
> > > > Whole-heartedly agree.  The reference should be deleted.
> > > >
> > > > Randy
> > > I agree, although I note it is something that we (in this or
> > > previous incarnations as a WG) have never modified: we inherited
> > it from RFC 3066.
> >
> > Both as co-chair and as contributor..
> >
> > There *have* been previous requests to get rid of it.
> > I find "we inherited it" rather unconvincing for a bit of
> > text that adds no value whatsoever to the document.
> >
> > Randy


--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp