[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6)



:sighs: as well, with co-author hat on.

I really think we are polishing far to much at this point. The document is long and involved, and we can certainly find lots of instances where wording could be improved; and could probably keep doing so for months and months on end.

What we should focus on now are just cases where the wording is sufficiently bad as to cause a real problem.

Mark


On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:05, Phillips, Addison <addison at amazon.com> wrote:
:: sighs ::

(as individual contributor)

It is useful to look at Section 2.2 when deciding what to do here. Please note that the comment is really about the run-on construction of the sentence, not the inclusion or omission of the title. I agree that we should fix the sentence's construction.

In proposing replacement text, I put on my editor hat and observed that each of the other subtag sections uses a similar formulation for the text. I say "similar" because actually the format varies somewhat. However, in all cases, the title is given for the ISO standard. Thus my proposal includes one, as it would be surprising to omit just the one title.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:52 AM
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue 53: Section 2.2.3 (2) is murky (Apps #6)
>
> Since Martin asked for additional feedback:
>
> The extra inclusion of the title of the ISO standard after its
> reference
> (here and elsewhere) seems pointless to me; I don't tend to see
> that
> sort of redundancy when referring to other RFCs.  But I don't think
> this
> is worth delaying the drafts for another few weeks or months, so I
> am OK
> with any decision either to remove this text or leave it in.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
> http://www.ewellic.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.