Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)

[Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>]

My input: let's get rid of it 

Let's also not spend time discussing historical side topics of no consequence when there's agreement to delete it.



Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:19 PM
To: LTRU Working Group
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)

Hi -

> From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:41 PM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)
>
> > As a technical contributor...
> > 
> > Whole-heartedly agree.  The reference should be deleted.
> > 
> > Randy
> 
> I agree, although I note it is something that we (in this or
> previous incarnations as a WG) have never modified: we inherited it from RFC 3066.

Both as co-chair and as contributor..

There *have* been previous requests to get rid of it.
I find "we inherited it" rather unconvincing for a bit of
text that adds no value whatsoever to the document.

Randy


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru