[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
To: Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:21:17 +0200
In-reply-to: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB8357956B064B910F at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <mailman.6475.1243216290.4936.ltru at ietf.org> <0717FC7F73404B4A9118B16CF0C9ED83 at DGBP7M81> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB8357956B064B910F at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:03:53PM -0700,
 Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote 
 a message of 58 lines which said:

> - XML was considered and there was no consensus to change.

In the interest of archive fans, the discussion was in
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg09734.html>

It seems that the last set of "issues" were raised by someone who did
not take the time to check the archives...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)
  - From: Peter Constable

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Can a WG member update <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ltru/> ? (Was: Issue #49: Add reference to RFC 5198 (Apps #2)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] In the interest of moving faster...
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #50: Change registry format to XML (Apps #3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.