[co-chair hat on]I conclude that there is consensus in the WG to not change anything in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis for this issue. The WG has discussed this issue already, and a wide variety of reasons has been given for why a change to an XML-based format at this point would be a bad idea.
Regards, Martin. On 2009/05/28 22:21, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:03:53PM -0700, Peter Constable<petercon at microsoft.com> wrote a message of 58 lines which said:- XML was considered and there was no consensus to change.In the interest of archive fans, the discussion was in <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg09734.html> It seems that the last set of "issues" were raised by someone who did not take the time to check the archives... _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
-- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.