Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)

["Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>]

[co-chair hat on]

I conclude that there is consensus in the WG to remove the reference to 
RFC 2860. Editors, please remove this reference from the draft, and 
treat IANA as a well-known abbreviation.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2009/05/28 8:59, Peter Constable wrote:
> My input: let's get rid of it
>
> Let's also not spend time discussing historical side topics of no consequence when there's agreement to delete it.
>
>
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:19 PM
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)
>
> Hi -
>
> > From: "Phillips, Addison"<addison at amazon.com>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn"<randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group"<ltru at ietf.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:41 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Ltru] Issue #52: Delete reference to RFC 2860 (Apps #5)
> >
> > > As a technical contributor...
> > >
> > > Whole-heartedly agree.  The reference should be deleted.
> > >
> > > Randy
> > I agree, although I note it is something that we (in this or
> > previous incarnations as a WG) have never modified: we inherited it from RFC 3066.
>
> Both as co-chair and as contributor..
>
> There *have* been previous requests to get rid of it.
> I find "we inherited it" rather unconvincing for a bit of
> text that adds no value whatsoever to the document.
>
> Randy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp