Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>]

> (Also, I know I've asked this question before, but why is a variant 
> subtag beginning with a digit listed as consisting of exactly one 
> digit plus 3 alphanumerica characters in the list mentioned above?? 
> (par 3):
> "variant       = 5*8alphanum         ; registered variants
>                / (DIGIT 3alphanum)",
>  
> and then just a paragraph down [par 5?  or 4?] a variant beginning 
> with a digit is described as having a length of 4-8 characters:
> "There is a subtlety in the ABNF
>    production 'variant': a variant starting with a digit has a minimum
>    length of four characters,

While this is true, I think deleting the word "minimum" here would fix 
the problem.

> while those starting with a letter have a
>    minimum length of five characters."  ??)
>