Hi - > From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com> > To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> > Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 1:14 PM > Subject: Re: Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review .... > 12). In Section 2.2.1: > > > 5. Any language subtags of 5 to 8 characters in length in the IANA > > registry were defined via the registration process in Section 3.5 > > and MAY be used to form the primary language subtag. An example > > of what such a registration might include: one of the > > grandfathered IANA registrations is "i-enochian". The subtag > > 'enochian' could be registered in the IANA registry as a primary > > language subtag (assuming that ISO 639 does not register this > > language first), making tags such as "enochian-AQ" and "enochian- > > Latn" valid. > > > > At the time this document was created, there were no examples of > > this kind of subtag and future registrations of this type are > > discouraged: primary languages are strongly RECOMMENDED for > > registration with ISO 639, > > I suggest that the RECOMMENDED is changed to a MUST, i.e. an attempt to > register it with ISO 639 must be made. Even if the outcome might be > known, arguments given by ISO 639 might provide useful input to the > Language Subtag Expert. > > > and proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA- > > JAC will be closely scrutinized by the Language Subtag Reviewer > > before they are registered with IANA. ... As a technical contributor, I can agree with this proposal, as long as the case of non-response or negative response is covered. Randy
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.