Re: [Ltru] Issue #43: AD #10 - section 5.1 vs 3.2 on File-Date value

["Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>]

I think Kent's proposed text, together with Martin's slight edit, is 
excellent.  It reflects current IANA practice, which works well and is 
really better than what 4646 says, and it provides a justification for 
the File-Date records in the replacement records even though IANA 
doesn't use them verbatim.  Let's go with it.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ


> ======PROPOSED TEXT=================
>
> Whenever an entry is created or modified in the registry, the
> 'File-Date' record at the start of the registry is updated to reflect
> the most recent modification date. The date format SHALL be the
> "full-date" format of [RFC3339] (Klyne, G., ed. and C. Newman, "Date
> and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", July 2002). The date SHALL be
> the date on which that version of the registry was first published by
> IANA. There SHALL be at most one version of the registry published in
> a day.
>
> A File-Date record is also included in each request to IANA to insert
> or modify records indicating the acceptance date of the records in the
> request.
>
> ======END PROPOSED TEXT=============