Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)

[Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>]

+1
Mark

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 06:54, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:

I've commented on this already: I don't see a need for any change.

-----Original Message-----
From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn

Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 6:57 PM
To: LTRU Working Group

Subject: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)

Hi -

Note well that there are two very distinct issues in Apps #12.
This thread is the first of the two.  PLEASE do not confuse
them in your followups!

> From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review
....
> 12). In Section 2.2.1:
>
> >    5.  Any language subtags of 5 to 8 characters in length in the IANA
> >        registry were defined via the registration process in Section 3.5
> >        and MAY be used to form the primary language subtag. An example
> >        of what such a registration might include: one of the
> >        grandfathered IANA registrations is "i-enochian".  The subtag
> >        'enochian' could be registered in the IANA registry as a primary
> >        language subtag (assuming that ISO 639 does not register this
> >        language first), making tags such as "enochian-AQ" and "enochian-
> >        Latn" valid.
> >
> >        At the time this document was created, there were no examples of
> >        this kind of subtag and future registrations of this type are
> >        discouraged: primary languages are strongly RECOMMENDED for
> >        registration with ISO 639,
>
> I suggest that the RECOMMENDED is changed to a MUST, i.e. an attempt to
> register it with ISO 639 must be made. Even if the outcome might be
> known, arguments given by ISO 639 might provide useful input to the
> Language Subtag Expert.
>
> >       and proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA-
> >        JAC will be closely scrutinized by the Language Subtag Reviewer
> >        before they are registered with IANA.
...

This is filed as issue #59 in the tracker.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ltru/trac/ticket/59

Randy


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru