IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Issue 63:

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 10 June 2009 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85223A6B99 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRl8D2vdfMQe for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmailgw01.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (scmailgw01.scop.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.251.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57343A68FE for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.158]) by scmailgw01.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id n5AAJALA004762 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:19:10 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 7a0f_23a2db3a_55a8_11de_aac6_001d096c566a; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:19:10 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:34636) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S1147577> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:23 +0900
Message-ID: <4A2F888D.2010507@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:18:53 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090108 Eudora/3.0b1pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Subject: [Ltru] Issue 63:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:19:11 -0000

[hats on]

[Randy: I have assigned this the next number (63). Can you please put 
this into the tracker accordingly. Thanks.]

Alex has promised not to send us any issues anymore, but in discussion 
with him, I have found out that there is one more that I think he would 
really like to be handled, and so I'm trying to help him by sending this 
to the WG myself.

The commenter in the Application Area review commented that we should 
use the U+00xx notation for identifying characters outside of ABNF. The 
reasons given are that the notation from the ABNF isn't intended for use 
outside the ABNF, and that it doesn't follow RFC 5137/BCP 137.

Regards,    Martin.

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email