Martin J. Dürst wrote:
[hats on][Randy: I have assigned this the next number (63). Can you please put this into the tracker accordingly. Thanks.]Alex has promised not to send us any issues anymore, but in discussion with him, I have found out that there is one more that I think he would really like to be handled, and so I'm trying to help him by sending this to the WG myself.The commenter in the Application Area review commented that we should use the U+00xx notation for identifying characters outside of ABNF. The reasons given are that the notation from the ABNF isn't intended for use outside the ABNF, and that it doesn't follow RFC 5137/BCP 137.
I think the latter argument (BCP 137) is more important, besides this would make 4646bis more consistent with other RFCs recently published.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.