[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 63: Replace %xgh with U+00gh in text



[technical contributor]

On 2009/06/10 20:09, Kent Karlsson wrote:
Den 2009-06-10 12.37, skrev "Martin J. Dürst"<duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>:

    lines containing only the sequence "%%" (U+0025 U+0025).
...
    The sequence '..' (U+002E U+002E) in a field-body denotes a range of

Nit-pick: Unicode (and ISO/IEC 10646) uses tuple syntax when denoting
character sequences. So:

     lines containing only the sequence "%%" (<U+0025, U+0025>).
...
     The sequence '..' (<U+002E, U+002E>) in a field-body denotes a range of

    other subtags in a tag by a hyphen ("-", [Unicode, p. 1077] U+002D).

I'm fine with adding the comma. I don't think the IETF uses '<' and '>', so I'd prefer to leave them out.


Still nit-picking: I'm not too keen on including a page number. This
is just as valid for other editions of TUS.

Fine with me to leave that out.

And does the reference have to
be placed so awkwardly?

No. I just left it where it was before. We didn't get a request to move the place of the reference. But I would be fine with ("-", U+002D [Unicode]) or so, if that looks better to you.

I don't think issue 63 needs lead to any changes in the text, but of course
I'm not opposed to the suggested changes (with fixes as above).

[chair/shepherd hat on]: If I won't be able to detect a clear preference in the WG for or against this change, I plan to put consensus on the side of change for this specific issue given the circumstances.

Regards,    Martin.

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.