[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)



Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:

Please express your preference (and the reasons for it) if you haven't already done so.

I agree that there is no need to change this RECOMMENDED to a MUST, because I don't see any particular advantage to requiring the requester to go to ISO 639 first instead of strongly encouraging her to do so, nor any way to enforce such a requirement anyway.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.