[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)

From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:55:20 -0600
References: <C65577FF.D9D0%kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>

Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at comhem dot se> wrote:

The process of maintaining the registry is permitted, but not
required, to change Description fields. I agree that the
current text could be formulated better. Peter suggested
redrafted text.


Fine.  I do not object.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
  - From: Kent Karlsson

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.