[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:

From: Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:45:09 -0700
In-reply-to: <4A2F8C65.8030009 at isode.com>
References: <4A2F888D.2010507 at it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4A2F8C65.8030009 at isode.com>

From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
Martin J. Dürst wrote:

> The commenter in the Application Area review commented that we should 
> use the U+00xx notation for identifying characters outside of ABNF. 

Where are we talking about? What particular changes are needed?

2.1.1 has references to specific characters, and it is using that notation already. Is different notation used elsewhere?

Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: Peter Constable

References:
- [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.