[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:

From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:26:15 +0100
In-reply-to: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01A89056C5 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <4A2F888D.2010507 at it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4A2F8C65.8030009 at isode.com> <4A2F8F4C.3040200 at it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01A89056C5 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>

Phillips, Addison wrote:

I support replacing ABNF notations as documented by Martin in a previous email on this thread with U+ notation. However I note that the ABNF for record-jar in Section 3.1.1 contains references to Unicode code points in this production:

  CHARS      = (%x21-10FFFF)      ; Unicode code points

I want to know if we can keep this, or, failing that, what we're supposed to change it to. Note that I got this particular production from draft-iri (that would be your draft, Martin :-) ).

Keep ABNF as is.

References:
- [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
  - From: Phillips, Addison

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 63:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.