[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:58:11 -0700
References: <4A193C2A.2000406 at isode.com> <4A2ACE41.7050308 at isode.com> <4A2D8C2C.7020409 at isode.com> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01A7DCE0F8 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <4A2E1EB9.7070200 at it.aoyama.ac.jp> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB8357956B06C92865 at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com><30b660a20906090927m3e3413ado25f8e11834c7d1be at mail.gmail.com><4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01A86ECDA4 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <4A2F0C92.7070002 at it.aoyama.ac.jp>

Hi -

> From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>; "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential
>
> [hats on]
>
> I have counted five people (this includes Randy, who commented on the
> general agreement with the need of doing something here in private) in
> favor of adding the two text pieces below, and nobody against.
>
> I would like to ask the editors to integrate these texts into the newest
> version of their draft, and Randy to close this issue.

Done.

Randy

References:
- [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review
  - From: Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)
  - From: Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)
  - From: Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential (was: Re: AD issue #14 (DoS potential) Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)
  - From: Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #62: (AD #14) DoS potential
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.