[Ltru] [OT] Re: Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)

["Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>]

On 2009/06/11 1:54, Mark Davis wrote:
> Oh, ask Mike Ksar about trying to get a response from the IETF charset
> registry!

I think that was years and years ago. Also, as far as I remember, he 
didn't understand very well how the process worked. Anyway, I think it's 
irrelevant for the current discussion.

Regards,    Martin. [now, but not then, an expert reviewer for charsets]


> But as I said, because the likelyhood of the text being invoked is so low,
> I'm ok with the current language, as imprecise as it is.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:25, Peter Constable<petercon at microsoft.com>wrote:
>
> > From: Debbie Garside [mailto:debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk]
> >
> > > > What problem is being fixed here? (I don't know that we have an existing
> > problem.)
> >
> > > It is a matter of clarity.  If we do not state that a requester MUST
> > first
> > > apply to the ISO 639 JAC there will always be the awkward cuss who comes
> > > along and causes a huge rumpus - we have had our fair share of these and
> > > sometimes it is better to dot the i's and cross the t's.  It could save
> > us a
> > > lot of time in the future.
> > You say, "we have had our fair share of these", but in over ten years
> > participating in IETF-languages I don't recall any serious problems having
> > arisen of the type we're discussing.
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltru mailing list
> > Ltru at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp