Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)

[Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>]

Title: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)

I would suggest deleting "by the community", since that does not seem
to play any essential role in this paragraph, and some (Mark at least, IIRC)
found a reference to the "community" objectionable. Personally, I don't
like the formulation "frowned upon" either, but no-one else has complained...


    /kent k


Den 2009-06-11 19.32, skrev "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>:
> --
> <t>The 'Description' field itself is not guaranteed to be stable and
> MAY be modified via the registration process. Errata 
> corrections or clarifications of intent are most typical. 
> Attempts to provide translations or transcriptions of entries 
> in the registry itself will probably be frowned upon by the community or 
> rejected outright, as changes of this nature have an impact on the 
> provisions in <xref target="ianastability"></xref>.</t>
> --