So let me try to suggest a specific text.
OLD:
At the time this document was created, there were no examples of
this kind of subtag and future registrations of this type are
discouraged: primary languages are strongly RECOMMENDED for
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
registration with ISO 639, and proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JAC will be closely scrutinized by the Language Subtag Reviewer
before they are registered with IANA.
NEW:
At the time this document was created, there were no examples of
this kind of subtag and future registrations of this type are
discouraged: an attempt to register a primary language MUST be
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
made to ISO 639, and proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JAC will be closely scrutinized by the Language Subtag Reviewer
before they are registered with IANA.
I.e. the discussion about what the Language Tag Reviewer is going to do
is not the point of this issue.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.