|
Debbie's proposal makes sense. --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar at hotmail.com From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk>Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:11:00 +0100 > Not wishing to hold this up... but it would be better to have a MUST and it
> is perfectly simple to enforce. Proposed text:
> ---
> In order for a primary language subtag request to be considered for
> registration within the Language Subtag Registry, the requester MUST supply
> evidence that they have previously applied to the ISO 639 JAC {or its successor} to encode the
> entity and that the request has been rejected.
|
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.