[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] par 3 of 2.2, "identification of subtag's type" (was Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review)


Hi--the table does get worse the more you try to change it I guess, but I still do not think everything is perfectly clear in the table  (I can make sense of it because I know what everything is meant to mean).
 
That said, it's still a useful table as far as showing the structure of language subtags!
 
Best,
 
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com

From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>

Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:46:54 -0600

 

> Kent Karlsson wrote:

... Replacing (DIGIT 3alphanum) by (DIGIT 3*7alphanum) would just introduce needless ambiguity in the grammar. 

s/ambiguity/redundancy/
> That said, Kent's response was spot-on. Everything that needs to be covered in the existing production is covered.

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.