Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> To: "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
> Cc: <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language withMUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
...
> I would propose a slight alteration of Alexey’s text to ensure we do this right:
>
> --
> At the time this document was created, there were no examples of
> this kind of subtag. Future registrations of this type are
> discouraged: an attempt to register any new proposed primary language MUST be
> made with ISO 639. Proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA-JAC are unlikely to meet the
> criteria for primary language subtags and are thus unlikely to be registered.
> --

As a technical contributor...

I could live with this.  (Though ironically, the same logic that led our
reviewer to object to some "MAY" language would also lead to a rejection
of this "MUST", but let's not worry about that!)

Randy