Phillips, Addison On 09-06-12 01.47:
(editor hat OFF)
I would propose a slight alteration of Alexey’s text to ensure we do this right: -- At the time this document was created, there were no examples of this kind of subtag. Future registrations of this type are discouraged: an attempt to register any new proposed primary language MUST be made with ISO 639. Proposals rejected by ISO 639/ RA-JAC are unlikely to meet the criteria for primary language subtags and are thus unlikely to be registered. --
- (minus)This seems redundant and over-explained. If being registered with ISO is close to being a criteria in itself, then saying that those that are rejected by ISO are "unlikely to meet the criteria" undermines that very point.
Since it is late in the day, I expect instead that I will incorporate Alexey’s text. His text I show as having support from at least five people (Alexey, Mark, Leif, Randy, myself), with none opposed and only CE Whitehead proposing different text.
+ -- leif halvard silli
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.