[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUST language in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)

From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:34:42 -0600
References: <A31ADABB52B840649E0AAA709681B6A2 at DGBP7M81> <4A31D675.2000208 at malform.no>

Leif Halvard Silli <lhs at malform dot no> wrote:

What does "are unlikely to meet the criteria" mean? Does it mean "arenot likely _to have met_ the criteria, but we will do an extra check,of course"? In other words: Is ISO acceptance a quality control, only?

The criteria of ISO 639 RA/JAC might not be exactly the same as thecriteria of the Reviewer and ietf-languages.


--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
  - From: Leif Halvard Silli

Prev by Date: [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23.txt
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #61: Problem with MAY in 3.5 on Description errata(Apps #13)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #59: replace RECOMMENDED language with MUSTlanguage in 2.2.1 (Apps #12a)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.