[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6

From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Cc: 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:25:54 +0900
In-reply-to: <3e0701ca0471$2cbf4ab0$0300a8c0 at Vickynew>
References: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB579874 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <000801ca03e0$6a22bea0$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer> <3e0701ca0471$2cbf4ab0$0300a8c0 at Vickynew>

On 2009/07/14 19:52, Debbie Garside wrote:

I do, however, think it would be a good idea to keep this list open for
general discussions

This is the plan. This happens with most if not all IETF WG list oncethe WG is done.


Regards,    Martin.

and if this proves the case I will inform the list as
and when I consider ISO 639-6 data sufficiently ready for incorporation.
Whether you decide to re-charter at that point (or at any other time) is up
to you.


--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp

References:
- [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry)
  - From: Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6
  - From: Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6
  - From: Debbie Garside

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] rechartering (to handle 639-6 or otherwise)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.