[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg at w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:11:53 +0200
In-reply-to: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843BEC at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <48037FF9.9030103 at gmx.de> <48049274.3090501 at gmx.de> <4A61B8B7.7030200 at gmx.de> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843B4F at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <4A61F5C2.3050906 at gmx.de> <20090718175918.GA3899 at mercury.ccil.org> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843BEC at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>

Phillips, Addison wrote:

Is there some reason why you aren't referring to BCP 47?
I think they are trying to be specific about their reference to avoid having <Language-Tag> change underneath them....


Exactly.

We need a precise reference to an ABNF production and definition here.Citing the BCP instead of the concrete document would make it impossibleto refer to a specific section (or even the name of a production).


BR, Julian

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
  - From: Phillips, Addison

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
Next by Date: [Ltru] Translation of RFC 4646bis
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
Next by thread: [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.