[Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?")

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>]

John Cowan wrote:
> Julian Reschke scripsit:
>
> > The intention was to normatively refer to that matching algorithm that 
> > actually is equivalent to what RFC2616 used to define (remember, we're 
> > not changing the protocol here). Did we pick the wrong one?
>
> No, basic filtering is the RFC 2616 algorithm all right.  You might
> consider allowing HTTP servers to do lookup if basic filtering
> produces no results: Apache already does this.
> ...

Now tracked as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/181>.

BR, Julian