[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:23:11 -0700
References: <mailman.110.1248029268.4909.ltru at ietf.org><8BA7C9A96AE849AE97FA9E1779A81D20 at DGBP7M81><30b660a20907191229h282c0673yae2a710c7a7a1248 at mail.gmail.com> <8D97027965E89F488BC87B919382D9FD053DF0F2 at ussdixms01.am.sony.com>

Hi -

> From: "Broome, Karen" <Karen.Broome at am.sony.com>
> To: "Mark Davis ⌛" <mark at macchiato.com>; "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
> Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
>
> Hmm. It appears that informative text that I requested previously to indicate
> that script tags should not be used with spoken content was removed?
...

Shouldn't have been - I recall we had good agreement on this point.

Randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
  - From: Phillips, Addison

References:
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry)
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly in upcoming registry)
  - From: Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry)
  - From: Broome, Karen

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcoming registry)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW: Anomaly inupcomingregistry)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.