[Ltru] Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?

[CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail.com>]

Hi.

From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:34:41 -0700
> The one bit of language tagging infrastructure that we have not revised since this
> whole body of work has started is RFC 3282, which defines Content-Language and
> Accept-Language.
> . . .
 
I'll look at it.
 
So far what I have is a minor English error:
 
1. Introductioin  par 3, 1rst sentence:
 
{COMMENT:  I think I prefer "either" before "or" in these conjoined clauses, the second of which I don't particularly like anyway, because of the phrase "might be"}
 
""In some contexts, it is possible to have information available in more than one language, or it might be possible . . . "
 
=>
"In some contexts, either it is possible to have information available in more than one language, or it might be possible . . ." 
 
* * *
 
6.  Acknowledgements, par 5, 1rst sentence:
 
{COMMENT:  Michael Everson is the "language subtag reviewer" and not the "language tag reviewer" I thought}
 
"Special thanks must go to Michael Everson, who has  served as language tag reviewer . . ."
 
=> "Special thanks must go to Michael Everson, who has  served as language subtag reviewer . . ."
* * *
Will we be updating the examples in Section 2?  These are all 'grandfathered.'
 

 
Best wishes,
 
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com