Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

As a technical contributor (returning from two blissful weeks without email) ...

> From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:34 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] RFC 3282: should we revise it?
>
> The one bit of language tagging infrastructure that we have not revised
> since this whole body of work has started is RFC 3282, which defines
> Content-Language and Accept-Language.

That was outside the scope for which ltru was originally chartered.

> This morning I had cause to want to reference it, but a desire not to
> (since it depends on 3066 rather than the current-and-future BCP 47).
> I'm pretty sure that the whole machinery of a WG is not needed to
> revise this document--I'm thinking it would make a suitable individual
> submission.

I agree.

> But I thought I'd mention it here to see if anyone had thoughts about
> whether it were necessary, whether this list would make a suitable
> place to solicit comments,

(As co-chair) This seems reasonable for now.  If it turns out to require
significant discussion, or if a better WG "home" appears, we
can redirect the discussion at that time.

> and whether anyone thought a WG charter were necessary for
> same (this last I studiously hope is not the case).

(As technical contributor) I would not support adding this work
to the ltru charter.

Randy