> > "For my part, I hope that *that* revision is completed in a *much* > shorter time that 3066bis has taken." > > As we now know, 4646bis took a year or so longer than 4646. You forget that there were a dozen or so draft-davis-phillips documents before the WG even started. No it didn't. Mark and I started 4646 on the very first day of the Iraq war. > This in turn suggests that it should be feasible for an individual > to > prepare and submit an update without experiencing the surreal > delays of > the LTRU process, and without being subjected to undue slings and > arrows. > Well, as noted, "ever the optimist"..... Addison
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.