Very good!
But wasn't BCP 47 supposed to be the concatenation of RFC 5646 and RFC 4647
(just like the previous instance of BCP 47 was the concatenation of RFC 4646
and RFC 4647).
What is currently given as BCP 47 is RFC 5646 alone, no RFC 4647.
/kent k
Den 2009-09-05 00.20, skrev "rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org"
<rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>:
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
> BCP 47
> RFC 5646
>
> Title: Tags for Identifying Languages
> Author: A. Phillips, Ed.,
> M. Davis, Ed.
> Status: Best Current Practice
> Date: September 2009
> Mailbox: addison at inter-locale.com,
> markdavis at google.com
> Pages: 84
> Characters: 208592
> Obsoletes: RFC4646
> See Also: BCP0047
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.