[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>, "IESG Secretary" <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
Cc: ltru at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:03:52 -0800
References: <20091130183002.073FE28C15D at core3.amsl.com> <BF2262AF099A70419F68A17FF6338DF404428D2D at TK5EX14MBXC141.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Hi -

> From: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>
> To: "IESG Secretary" <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>; <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
> Cc: <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
>
> Note: searches for BCP 47 don't quickly take one to RFC 5646. In particular, one result is this link
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47
> 
> which take one to RFC 4646.


No, it does not.  The first line below the list of links says:
[Note that this file is a concatenation of more than one RFC.]

The RFCs there are 4647 and 5646.
It looks fine to me.

Randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
  - From: Peter Constable

References:
- [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
  - From: IESG Secretary
- Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
  - From: Peter Constable

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] WG Action: Conclusion of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.