I don't know who you are referring to... But I know of a book partly on the
subject of using Hangul as a phonetic alphabet (OPA, Othophonic alphabet):
The Korean alphabet of 1446 Expositions, OPA, The visible speech sounds,
Annotated translation, Future applicability; Sek Yen Kim-Cho, Humanity Books
and AC Press, New York, 2002, ISBN 89-428-1587-1.
http://www.amazon.com/Korean-Alphabet-1446-Expositions-Applicability/dp/1591
02000X
/kent k
Den 2009-12-16 09.59, skrev "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>:
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy
> Presuhn
>
>> (FWIW, I don't see why a pronouncing alphavet would *necessarily* be a
>> romanization system.)
>
> Indeed: I met a Korean linguist about 10 years ago who was promoting use of
> Hangul for general phonetic transcription.
>
>
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.