Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03

I just posted an update for items raised on this list.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03

Diffs: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03.txt

   - Fixed title
   - Fixed a few places to make it clearer that it is results-based (Felix)
   - Removed duplicate paragraph
   - Fixed ABNF nits
   - Fixed typo

Please see if that addresses the concerns.

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:02, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:

> 13.07.2011 09:48, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>
>  I think "BCP 47 Extension T" is a very bad title...
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. Here is something for a start: "A Language Tag Extension for
>> Transliterations/**Transcriptions"
>>
>
> But the abstract refers to translations as well. I wonder if
> "A Language Tag Extension 'Trans'"
> would be acceptable - "Trans" is cryptic, but more suggestive than "T".
>
> Or, as the abstract says "transformed content, including content that has
> been transliterated, transcribed, or translated, or in some other way
> influenced by the source", what about
>
> "A Language Tag Extension for Transformations"
>
> (perhaps with the word "Text" before "Transformations")?
>
> Actually the pages banners now have "BCP 47 Transform Extension"...
>
> --
> Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~**jkorpela/ <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ltru<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>
>