ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, (continued)
  • [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Marion Gunn
    • OT RE: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Debbie Garside
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Liaison with TC37/SC2, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Liaison with TC37/SC2, Marion Gunn
  • Re: [Ltru] Liaison with TC37/SC2, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Sue Ellen Wright
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Scopes and types, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Serbo-Croatian, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Where to put language-type info (was: Re: Is 639-3 bog us ?), McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Where to put language-type info (was: Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] [Fwd: Re: XML 4e and language tags...], Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
    • RE: [Ltru] Click letters, Kent Karlsson
      • RE: [Ltru] Click letters, Peter Constable
      • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Click letters, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Click letters, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Click letters, Ted Hardie
      • Re: [Ltru] Click letters, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Click letters, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Click letters, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Scopes and types (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Scopes and types (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Scopes and types, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Yinglish, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Yinglish, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
      • [OT] RE: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), Peter Constable
      • Re: [OT] RE: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
      • Re: [OT] RE: [Ltru] Yinglish (was: Is 639-3 bogus ?), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Yinglish, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Fwd: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 67th IETF Meeting in San Diego, California, USA, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: Draft-4645bis-01 posted to Web site, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Draft-4645bis-01 posted to Web site, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Draft-4645bis-01 posted to Web site, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Draft-4645bis-01 posted to Web site, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Draft-4645bis-01 posted to Web site, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value cycles (was: Registry deltas), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value cycles, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] OT: Language picking, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] RE: Language picking, Debbie Garside
    • [Ltru] Re: Language picking, John Cowan
    • [Ltru] RE: Language picking, Don Osborn
      • [Ltru] Re: Language picking, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] RE: Language picking, Don Osborn
      • [Ltru] RE: Language picking, Alberto Escudero Pascual
      • [Ltru] Re: Language picking, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Consensus, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Karen_Broome
  • [Ltru] Re: Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"... (long), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"..., John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Great Script Debate "the Next Generation"..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Debbie Garside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field), Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ?, Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ?, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Is 639-3 bogus ? (was: Proposal: include new"Language-Type:" field), Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Martin Duerst
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Marion Gunn
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Registering RS and ME, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Marion Gunn
      • [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Vladimir Weinstein
    • RE: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Debbie Garside
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] CS, ME, RS in 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Consensus, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Consensus, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Consensus, Kent Karlsson
      • [Ltru] fixing "replaced by" comments ( was Consensus), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Consensus, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: OT: Managing the big list of subtags, John Cowan
• [Ltru] OT: Managing the big list of subtags, John Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Mark Davis
    • RE: [Ltru] OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] OT: Managing the big list of subtags, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Serbia and Montenegro in example, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Serbia and Montenegro in example, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Minor error in 4646 Appendix A, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Minor error in 4646 Appendix A, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Minor error in 4646 Appendix A, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Minor error in 4646 Appendix A, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] OT: XML converter (was: Registry deltas), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Kent Karlsson
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Preferred-Value cycles (was: Registry deltas), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value cycles, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script: fix registration description, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 19, Issue 88, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 19, Issue 88, Mark Davis
    • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations for Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
      • [OT] Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations forInternationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] [OT] Re: RFC 4690 on Review and Recommendations forInternationalized Domain Names (IDNs), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Re-use of a region code for the same purpose, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Re-use of a region code for the same purpose, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Re-use of a region code for the same purpose, Martin Duerst
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Misha Wolf
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
  • Message not available
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
  • Re: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Registry deltas, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Registry deltas, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], Misha Wolf
  • Re: [Ltru] Re-use of a region code for the same purpose [was: Re: ISO 3166-1 newsletter on Serbia and Montenegro], John Cowan
• [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-00, David Conrad
• [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Small fix to text on Suppress Script, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] ADMIN: Enforcement of suspension of posting rights (Re: langauge vs. locale), Harald Alvestrand
• [Ltru] UK redux (was: Re: langauge vs. locale), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • [Ltru] OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: OT: ISO/IEC 10646 and ISO/IEC 14651 freely available, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Pre-draft-00 for RFC 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: frr, fy, ngo, tt, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] CLDR mysteries solved!, John Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: CLDR mysteries solved!, "Reshat Sabiq (Reşat)"
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script candidates (was: Re: frr, fy, ngo, tt), "Reshat Sabiq (Reşat)"
  • [Ltru] RE: frr, fy, ngo, tt, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-script considered least harmful, Frank Ellermann
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Serbia and Montenegro in example, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
    • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Masayasu Ishikawa
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 NEWSLETTER No. V-12 ("Serbia" and "Montenegro"), Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] RE: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Variant for a Latin-basedalphabet for Id?l-Ural (Qazan) Tatar (iqtel), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Process, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
      • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
      • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Process, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Process, Addison Phillips
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Process, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, McDonald, Ira
  • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Misha Wolf
  • Message not available
    • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Stephen Deach
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
    • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Proofreading the Registry (was: Re: zh-hakka), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, McDonald, Ira
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Peter Constable
    • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Kent Karlsson
      • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML (Clarification), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Ned Freed
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Ted Hardie
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] [OT] A language tag parser, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Region subtag changes, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] RS region subtag, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
    • [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] zh-hakka (was: Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
    • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan