ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, (continued)
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
  • Message not available
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
  • Message not available
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-script considered least harmful, Frank Ellermann
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Serbia and Montenegro in example, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-script considered least harmful, Martin Duerst
    • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Masayasu Ishikawa
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Crispin
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Korean (and Japanese) (was: Re: Suppress-Script batch 1), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Suppress-Script batch 1, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Suppress-Script batch 1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] ISO 3166-1 NEWSLETTER No. V-12 ("Serbia" and "Montenegro"), Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar', John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] RE: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Variant for a Latin-basedalphabet for Id?l-Ural (Qazan) Tatar (iqtel), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Process, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Process, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
      • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Process, Doug Ewell
      • RE: [Ltru] Process, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Process, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Process, Addison Phillips
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Process, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, McDonald, Ira
  • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Misha Wolf
  • Message not available
    • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Stephen Deach
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Advice for software; basic well-formedness (was: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Chris Lilley
      • Message not available
      • [Ltru] RE: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Updated article: Two-letter or three-letter language codes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue (was: Status of draft-4645bis-00), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] 4646(bis) typo / issue, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: 4646(bis) typo / issue, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Status of draft-4645bis-00, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Status of draft-4645bis-00, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
    • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Felix Sasaki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Proofreading the Registry (was: Re: zh-hakka), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, McDonald, Ira
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Peter Constable
    • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Kent Karlsson
      • RE: [Ltru] Errors in prototype 4646bis Registry, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
  • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
    • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML (Clarification), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: To XML or not to XML, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] To XML or not to XML, Ned Freed
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Ted Hardie
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: IANA XML registries, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, Lisa Dusseault
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, John Cowan
• [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: split section 3.1, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] split section 3.1, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] [OT] A language tag parser, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Region subtag changes, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Region subtag changes, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, David Conrad
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] RS region subtag, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
    • [Ltru] Re: [Partially OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] zh-hakka (was: Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
    • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: [OT] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] On deprecating 639-2 language collections, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Process for creating 4646bis Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: [OT] record-jar format draft..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: DOCTYPE ltru, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] [OT] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [OT] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere? (Was: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: Messages from John Cowan not distributed everywhere?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] IPA and other transcriptions (was: Re: script tag for IPA), Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: ISO 15924 process, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] ISO 15924 process, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] [OT] IE7 RC1..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
    • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] RE: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8), Mark Davis
    • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: Registry Format, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, McDonald, Ira
    • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
      • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] record-jar (was: UTF-8), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] record-jar, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Preferred-Value fun..., Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Preferred-Value fun..., Frank Ellermann
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value fun..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] further edits..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan, Mark Davis
    • [Ltru] Tiny URLs (was: 4646bis-00 review by John Cowan), Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: [Tools-discuss] Tiny URLs, Henrik Levkowetz
      • [Ltru] Re: Tiny URLs, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Tiny URLs, Henrik Levkowetz
      • [Ltru] Re: Tiny URLs, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: Tiny URLs, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Format of the registry (Was: RFC 4645 on Initial L anguage Subtag Registry, McDonald, Ira
  • [Ltru] Re: Format of the registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
  • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Jukka K. Korpela
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Hosken
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Parsabiliy of tags (Was: script tag for IPA, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Marion Gunn
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Debbie Garside
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] transcriptions and transliterations, Addison Phillips
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Michael Everson
      • [Ltru] OT: Latf, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: [Ltru] script tag for IPA, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Two subtags with same description (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, McDonald, Ira
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-3 description changes, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Extlangs or not? (was: Re: diffs, changes, etc.), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Addison Phillips
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Extlangs or not?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] diffs, changes, etc., Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Addison Phillips
      • [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: diffs, changes, etc., John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] diffs, changes, etc., Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] submission: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis, version 0, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Fw: Email with attached legal disclaimers, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Comments that refer to "ISO codes", John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Up-to-date copies of the LSR, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Deprecated (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] ISO 639-3 description changes (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-3 description changes (was: Re: 3066ter encompassed languages), John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-3 description changes, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] draft ID nearly ready..., Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: draft ID nearly ready..., Frank Ellermann