ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, (continued)
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-13.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-13 of IETF LTRU Registry..., Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] News flash (was: record jar reference), Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: News flash, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] ABNF typo (Was: News flash), Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: ABNF typo (Was: News flash), Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, McDonald, Ira
    • [Ltru] registry URL (was: record jar reference), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Randy Presuhn
      • RE: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Scott Hollenbeck
      • Re: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Randy Presuhn
      • RE: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Scott Hollenbeck
      • Re: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Randy Presuhn
      • RE: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Scott Hollenbeck
      • Re: [Ltru] Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, John.Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, John.Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Délégué Général
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Add rup?, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Add rup?, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Move chapter 3 of initial registry?, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] record jar reference, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: record jar reference, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP?, John.Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Brian E Carpenter
    • [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Brian E Carpenter
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Scott Hollenbeck
• [Ltru] [psg.com #892] [Comment] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #892] [Comment] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Trouble ticket problems?, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Trouble ticket problems?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Trouble ticket problems?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Versailles meeting, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] a question I received, r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] a question I received, r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry andinitialization documents, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] [iana-prot-param at icann.org: [rt.icann.org #3687] FW: I approve the deprecation of zh-guoyu (Mandarin Chinese) (language-tags)(Completed)], John.Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry andinitialization documents, Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry andinitialization documents, John.Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Peter Constable
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
  • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips
  • Message not available
    • RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
  • RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
    • Re: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John.Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
  • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, John.Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re:[psg.com #1109] IETF/LC case canonicalization in registry(gen-art 3), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Re:[psg.com #1107] IETF/LC Transition rules (gen-art 1), Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re:[psg.com #1107] IETF/LC Transition rules (gen-art 1), Karen_Broome
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1108] IETF/LC Recall of the LSR (gen-art 2), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
  • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Sam Hartman
    • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Sam Hartman
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John.Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878), Randy Presuhn
      • The LTRU initialization document (was: Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878)), John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878), r&d afrac
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, r&d afrac
    • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Joel M. Halpern
  • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin
      • [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] issues numbered [psg.com #1107] to [psg.com #1129], Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1130] IETF/LC remove rules in section 2 duplicated from registry draft, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1130] IETF/LC remove rules in section 2 duplicated from registry draft, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] proposed changes in response to GenArt comments, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] what happens when GF tag and new registration with differentmeaning collide (gen-art #17), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] make hypothetical nature of extlang registrations clear(gen-art #17), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] maintain registration records for every single subtag(gen-art #10), Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, John.Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, John.Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), r&d afrac
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), r&d afrac
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Kent Karlsson
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] updated editor's copy, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] frowning on long texts (gen-art #21), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: frowning on long texts (gen-art #21), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] clarifying what a redundant tag is (gen-art #20), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] choice of subtags in multilingual documents (gen-art #19), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] make hypothetical nature of extlang registrations clear (gen-art #17), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] personal comment: another GF text problem, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] personal comment: bad GF sentence in S3.2, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] what happens when GF tag and new registration with different meaning collide (gen-art #17), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] case of the subtag in a registration (gen-art #16), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: case of the subtag in a registration (gen-art #16), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] ungarble description of Preferred-Value (gen-art #16), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] ungarble description of Preferred-Value (gen-art #16), Scott Hollenbeck
• [Ltru] give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: give ABNF for Prefix (gen-art #15), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] remove MUST from capitalization in registry requirements (gen-art #14), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] include 'grandfathered' ANBF in 'Tag' description (gen-art #12), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] numeric ranges in the registry (gen-art #11), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: numeric ranges in the registry (gen-art #11), Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] maintain registration records for every single subtag (gen-art #10), Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), John.Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18, r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), John.Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), John.Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1131] IETF/LC update entry for zh-guoyu, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Fw: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] define the LSR (gen-art #9), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] UN economic groupings (gen-art #8), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] various casing issues (gen-art #7), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] documenting the update load (gen-art #5), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] define the LSR (gen-art #4), Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] define the LSR (gen-art #4), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] (gen-art #1-5,7-9), Mark Davis
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1110] IETF/LC define the LSR (gen-art 4), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] case canonicalization in registry (gen-art #3), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re:[psg.com #1109] IETF/LC case canonicalization in registry (gen-art 3), Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] case canonicalization in registry (gen-art #3), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] case canonicalization in registry (gen-art #3), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Recall of the LSR (gen-art #2), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Recall of the LSR (gen-art #2), John.Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: Recall of the LSR (gen-art #2), Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1108] IETF/LC Recall of the LSR (gen-art 2), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1108] IETF/LC Recall of the LSR (gen-art 2), r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Recall of the LSR (gen-art #2), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Transition rules (gen-art #1), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re:[psg.com #1107] IETF/LC Transition rules (gen-art 1), Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1107] IETF/LC Transition rules (gen-art 1), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1107] IETF/LC Transition rules (gen-art 1), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] RE: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Fw: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Case sensitive registration (GenArt), Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Economic groupings (GenArt), Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Alphabetical ranges (GenArt), Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] At least one prefix for variant (GenArt), John.Cowan
  • [Ltru] More than one script in a tag (GenArt), Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] FW: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] FW: Gen-art review: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] decorum, Randy Presuhn
  • scaling (was Re: [Ltru] decorum), r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: STD, Doug Ewell
• RE: FW: [Ltru] Re:what to call 639-6 (was STD), Addison Phillips
  • Re: FW: [Ltru] Re:what to call 639-6 (was STD), Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Randy Presuhn
    • RE: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Debbie Garside
      • RE: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Mark Davis
    • RE: [Ltru] what to call 639-6, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Use of term "RFC 3066bis" (was: Re: STD), Doug Ewell
• RE: FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for IdentifyingLanguages' toBCP), Peter Constable
  • RE: FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for IdentifyingLanguages' toBCP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• [Ltru] OT: record-jar, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] OT: record-jar, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Communication protocols, Karen_Broome
  • Message not available
    • [Ltru] Re: Communication protocols, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FW: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, John.Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, r&d afrac
      • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Délégué Général
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] ICU / CLDR (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Peter Constable
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), r&d afrac
• Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
  • FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
  • FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
    • Re: FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Mark Davis
      • Re: FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), r&d afrac
      • RE: FW: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
• RE: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Reloading the registry (was: STD), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Reloading the registry, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Minor regret, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: STD, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), r&d afrac
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' toBCP), Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru], Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), Addison Phillips
  • Message not available
    • RE: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), r&d afrac
• [Ltru] update on ISO 639, Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] update on ISO 639, r&d afrac
  • [Ltru] Re: update on ISO 639, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: update on ISO 639, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: update on ISO 639, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] completion of ltru WG milestone, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Minor regret, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Minor regret, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), John.Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    • [Ltru] IANA effects (was: STD), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] IANA effects (was: STD), Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), McDonald, Ira
• RE: [Ltru] AD Evaluation Comments: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12 anddraft-ietf-ltru-initial-04, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, The IESG
  • [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • [Ltru] Re: STD, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] AD Evaluation Comments: draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12 and draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04, Scott Hollenbeck
• [Ltru] Publication request for <draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt> as RFC (BCP), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Publication request for <draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt> as RFC (BCP), r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Mark Davis
      • Distance Metric (was: Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: Distance Metric, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Distance Metric, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Distance Metric, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Mark Davis
      • Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
      • Re: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), r&d afrac
      • Re: Nonstandard distance metrics (Re: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags), Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] editor's copy of matching updated..., Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of matching updated..., r&d afrac
    • [Ltru] matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags (was: editor's copy of matching updated...), Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] Re: matching for non-RFC3066bis langtags (was: editor's copy of matching updated...), r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Updates to ltru WG charter milestone dates, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-12.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] Submission: draft-12 of draft-ietf-ltru-registry, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Publication request for <draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt> as an Informational RFC, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-initial-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-11.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-11.txt, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-11.txt, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Submission: LTRU initial-registry draft-04, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Submission: LTRU initial-registry draft-04, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] appeal intent report to ADs, r&d afrac
  • [Ltru] Re: appeal intent report to ADs, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: appeal intent report to ADs, r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: appeal intent report to ADs, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: appeal intent report to ADs, r&d afrac
• Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, r&d afrac
  • [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, r&d afrac
      • [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations (mostly off topic), Martin Duerst
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations (mostly off topic), r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Peter Constable
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] End of ltru WG last calls on registry and initial registryi-ds, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Submission: draft-ietf-ltru-registry draft #11, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] End of ltru WG last calls on registry and initial registry i-ds, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Jefsey Morfin
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: WGLC security considerations, Martin Duerst
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] WGLC security considerations, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: LTRU Milestones past due, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: LTRU Milestones past due, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: LTRU Milestones past due, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: LTRU Milestones past due, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: comments in the registries, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: comments in the registries, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] URN:ISBN (was:: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-levelDescription field), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] 1095 or whatever (was: URN:ISBN), Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1096] "nb" versus "no", Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1096] "nb" versus "no", Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1096] "nb" versus "no", r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] URN:ISBN (was:: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field), Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] [psg.com #1095]] URN:ISBN, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, r&d afrac
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, r&d afrac
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Timeout, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Erkki Kolehmainen
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1104] WGLC ensure that extension registry hasFile-Date, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1104] WGLC ensure that extension registry hasFile-Date, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [ltru][psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1104] WGLC ensure that extension registry has File-Date, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] comments in the registries ( was [psg.com #1099] WGLC addempty extension registry), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Misha Wolf
    • Re: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] LTRU Milestones past due, r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] continued discussion of references section, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] comments in the registries ( was [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: comments in the registries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Proposed file-level "Description" field (was: Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1103] WGLC Add File-level Description field, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] non-script support, r&d afrac
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtagandextensionsregistries, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtagandextensionsregistries, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtagandextensionsregistries, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rt.psg.fun, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Use of shepherding procedures, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Use of shepherding procedures, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Use of shepherding procedures, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensions registries, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensions registries, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensions registries, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensions registries, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag andextensionsregistries, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag andextensionsregistries, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtagandextensionsregistries, Kent Karlsson
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtagandextensionsregistries, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Wrapping up the second WG last calls on the registry and initial registry drafts, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Wrapping up the second WG last calls on the registry and initial registry drafts, r&d afrac
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Scott Hollenbeck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1099] WGLC add empty extension registry, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensions registries, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1098] WGLC distinguish subtag and extensionsregistries, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Minor regret, Mark Davis
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Kent Karlsson
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1097] ABNF cleanup in matching draft, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] reference section cleanup, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] reference section cleanup, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] reference section cleanup, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] [psg.com #1094] WGLC add internationalization considerations section, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] new editor's copy online, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] reference section cleanup, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: new editor's copy online, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: new editor's copy online, Kent Karlsson
      • [Ltru] [psg.com #1095] continued discussion of references section, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Test, Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimers and IETF RFCs), L.Gillam
• RE: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETFRFCs), Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETF RFCs), Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • RE: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETF RFCs), r&d afrac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETF RFCs), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETFRFCs), Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] singleton DIGIT (was: W3C tag policy disclaimersand IETF RFCs), Erkki Kolehmainen