ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[ltru List Information]
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #966] remove something from security considerations, (continued)
- [Ltru] Re: last response,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1014] make scope of applicability universal,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1011] add suppress-region,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #966] remove something from security considerations,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] [psg.com #1014] make scope of applicability universal,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] three more closed issues: 1012, 1013, and 1015,
Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1011] add suppress-region,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] use of region subtags,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] [psg.com #1009] generic variant subtags,
Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] last response (was: character set considerations materialis contradictory),
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] On the records (was Editorial error in BNF),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] Re: Editorial error in BNF,
Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] addresshomographissuesinsecurityconside rations,
McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] addresshomographissuesinsecurityconsiderations,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] issue resolutions 999 & 1000,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Re: Fix for ambiguous conformance requirements,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Editorial error in BNF,
John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homographissuesinsecurityconsiderations,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] draft of draft-03 posted...,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Fix for ambiguous conformance requirements,
McDonald, Ira
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #967] address homograph issues in security considerations,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Tickets [psg.com #993] through [psg.com #996],
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Ltru] UNSD adds two new codes,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Submission: LTRU Registry Draft 02,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] while we're housekeeping...,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #992] provide way to alias language-variantcombination to a lang-extlang combination,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] Schizophrenic treatment of grandfathered tags,
John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
McDonald, Ira
- Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Misha Wolf
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally support ed,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] completed milestone for ltru charter,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Re: grandfathered tags and generative capacity,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #985] Specify case rules for canonical tags,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] grandfathered tags and generative capacity,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] RE: Some comments on draft-ietf-ltru-matching-00,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-matching-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #985] Specify case rules for canonical ta gs,
McDonald, Ira
- [Ltru] [psg.com #985] Specify case rules for canonical tags,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Issues [psg.com #982] through [psg.com #991],
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Re: [WG I-D Submission] draft-ietf-ltru-matching-00,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] [WG I-D Submission] draft-ietf-ltru-matching-00,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Open points before -02,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] New version of matching draft...,
Addison Phillips
- [Ltru] RE: sad and afflicting (was [psg.com #969]character set considerations material is contradictory),
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Suspension of Jefsey until 2005-05-22,
Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] ltru issues 972-981,
Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issuesinsecurityconsi derations,
McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecuritycons iderations,
McDonald, Ira
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issuesinsecurityconsiderations,
Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues insecurityconsiderations,
Misha Wolf
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #969]character set considerations material iscontradictory,
Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #965] expectation of support for automated readingof registry,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is confusing,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues in securityconsiderations,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] [psg.com #970] add reference to xml schema version 1.0,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #969]character set considerations material is contradictory,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #968] load on IANA server by applications,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #967] address homograph issues in security considerations,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #966] remove something from security considerations,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #965] expectation of support for automated reading of registry,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #964] section 3.4 of -00 is hard to understand,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is confusing,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #962] use CAN instead of MAY in section 3.3 of -00,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #961] re-work part 3 of -00 draft,
Randy Presuhn
RE: xml2rfc category (was RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] shouldintroduction alludetointendedbcp status?),
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude tointendedbcp status?,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intendedbcp status?,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639registration request has been processed?,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] [psg.com #960] use ITU E.164 calling codes instead of ISO 3166 country codes,
Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #951] extensibility via codes not maintained byISO,
Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: a way toward homograph resolution ?,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #956] document use of "" as deprecation indicator,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #955] expand scope to include computer languages,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #953] change process for handling registration requests,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #951] extensibility via codes not maintained by ISO,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #950] iso 3166 inadequate for regional variants,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: RFC 2277 - considerations,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #949] remove three-character limit in sections 2.2.2, 2.2.3 (of -00),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #948] deprecate two-letter language codes in favor of three-letter ones,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #947] is set of possible primary languages too constrained?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #946] use of both length and position to identify subtag problematic,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #945] use "." to separate subtags,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #943] number of subtags SHOULD be limited to four,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #942] clarify advice on use of subtags,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #941] determining currency of registry versions,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #940] is the word "recognized" unclear in the syntax section?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #939] explain difference between tags and labels,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intended bcp status?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #937] is the word "interchange" in the abstract unclear?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #936] is the phrase "information object" in the abstract unclear?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #935] is the word "indicate" in the abstract unclear?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #934] repertoire for descriptions in registry entries,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: [psg.com #933] Java support,
Doug Ewell
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #944] MAY a conformant implementation impose length constraints?,
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #944] MAY a conformant implementation imposelengthconstraints?,
Addison Phillips
jamais deux sans trois ? (was RE: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations),
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #946] use of both length and positiontoidentify subtag problematic,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] [psg.com #959] consolidate review process instructions,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #958] move tag formation rules,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #957] compatibility of description format with ISO table format,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #956] document use of "" as deprecation indicator,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #955] expand scope to include computer languages,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #954] all aliases must be equally supported,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #953] change process for handling registration requests,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #952] how to determine whether an ISO 639 registration request has been processed?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #951] extensibility via codes not maintained by ISO,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #950] iso 3166 inadequate for regional variants,
Randy Presuhn
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #934] repertoire for descriptions inregistryentries,
Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #944] MAY a conformant implementation impose lengthconstraints?,
Addison Phillips
[Ltru] [psg.com #949] remove three-character limit in sections 2.2.2, 2.2.3 (of -00),
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #948] deprecate two-letter language codes in favor of three-letter ones,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #947] is set of possible primary languages too constrained?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #946] use of both length and position to identify subtag problematic,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #945] use "." to separate subtags,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #944] MAY a conformant implementation impose length constraints?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #943] number of subtags SHOULD be limited to four,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #942] clarify advice on use of subtags,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #941] determining currency of registry versions,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #940] is the word "recognized" unclear in the syntax section?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #939] explain difference between tags and labels,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #938] should introduction allude to intended bcp status?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #937] is the word "interchange" in the abstract unclear?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #936] is the phrase "information object" in the abstract unclear?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #935] is the word "indicate" in the abstract unclear?,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #934] repertoire for descriptions in registry entries,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] [psg.com #933] Java support,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Another batch of ltru tickets in RT,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
ned . freed
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
ned . freed
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] date problem,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Ltru] Re: date problem,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Erkki Kolehmainen
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
ned . freed
- Re: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Misha Wolf
- RE: [Ltru] RFC 2277 - considerations,
Peter Constable
RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltr u-registry-01,
McDonald, Ira
RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01,
Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] ISO/TC 46 mtgs in Dublin (Ireland) next week,
Marion Gunn
[Ltru] Re: 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: 3 - Simplified registry ABNF (was: Open points before -02),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Last registry for now,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Re: Last registry for now,
Doug Ewell
RE: [Ltru] Re: Last registry for now,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] Re: regionalisation,
Doug Ewell
RE: [Ltru] 5 - Appendix D: Redundant Tags (was: Open points before -02),
Addison Phillips
RE: [Ltru] 3 - Simplified registry ABNF (was: Open points before -02),
Addison Phillips
[Ltru] Last registry for now,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] regionalisation,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
RE: [Ltru] Re: Open tickets on initial registry,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] Open points before -02,
Frank Ellermann
[Ltru] Re: ISO 3166-1 DIS ballot,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Fw: Area Advisor Changes,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
RE: [Ltru] aaa-bbb-ccc-ddd-eee-fff-ggg-hhh-Latn-US-boont (was: -01 nits),
Peter Constable
Mail converted by MHonArc
