ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• [Ltru] Format for extension registry, Addison Phillips
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Format for extension registry, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • [Ltru] Re: Format for extension registry, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Format for extension registry, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #907] Question about some draft text., Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., McDonald, Ira
  • RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Question about some draft text., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representationofnative name of language, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representationofnative name of language, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCIIrepresentationofnative name of language, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parentorganizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation ofnative name of language, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] OT - Traffic, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISOdocuments, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, ned . freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, John Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
  • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: draft review, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: draft review, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: draft review, Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] Re: e[n]-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Doug Ewell
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] Using RT, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Using RT, ned . freed
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #906] reference to ABNF needs update, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #906] reference to ABNF needs update, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #904] add "Comment" field, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #905] update IPR boilerplate, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #905] update IPR boilerplate, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #902] AutoReply: add "Name_Changed" field, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #903] add "Former_Name" field, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #901] add "Deprecated" field, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #901] add "Deprecated" field, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #901] add "Deprecated" field, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, rt+ltru-initial
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, rt+ltru-initial
    • [Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: remove region subtag 200, John Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John.Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] #1026 (was: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200), Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Written Spoken Signed, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] [psg.com #1033] Written Spoken Signed, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #1033] Written Spoken Signed, Randy Presuhn
      • RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1033] Written Spoken Signed, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] #1026 (was: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200), Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: #1026, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: #1026, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, John.Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Randy Presuhn
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #900] remove region subtag 200, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, rt+ltru-initial
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #899] remove region subtag 172, rt+ltru-initial
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #898] change comments for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #897] change canonical values to match ISO 3166:1998 for region subtags withdrawn after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #897] change canonical values to match ISO 3166:1998 for region subtags withdrawn after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #897] change canonical values to match ISO 3166:1998 for region subtags withdrawn after 1988, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtagswithdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #896] change descriptions for region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 after 1988, rt+ltru-initial
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #894] AutoReply: add figure-of-merit matching, rt+ltru-matching
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #894] add figure-of-merit matching, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes"too large", Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #895] remove region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 before 1988, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #895] remove region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 before 1988, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #895] remove region subtags withdrawn from ISO 3166 before 1988, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #891] support non-ASCII representation of native name of language, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISO lists, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISO lists, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #889] registry should be consistent with ISOlists, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #888] ietf-languages mailing list is not the IANA list presented in RFC 3066, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #888] ietf-languages mailing list is not the IANA list presented in RFC 3066, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #890] include character set information in tags, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should be informative, rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should beinformative, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #887] references to 3066 and 1766 should be informative, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] registry should be bilingual, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #886] registry should add French translations, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #885] split references between normative and informative, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #885] split references between normative and informative, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] interesting IETF archives on language tags, Jefsey Morfin
  • Re: [Ltru] interesting IETF archives on language tags, John Cowan
• [Ltru] "talking" to RT and duplicate messages, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #883] language tag reviewers should be elected, rather than appointed, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #884] remove dead references, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #884] remove dead references, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
    • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Tex Texin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fieldsfrom ISO documents, Tex Texin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • [Ltru] Re: registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, L.Gillam
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #882] registry should copy non-English fields from ISO documents, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #878] should the initial registry contents i-d be published as an RFC?, rt+ltru-initial
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #878] should the initial registry contents i-d be published as an RFC?, rt+ltru-initial
    • Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #878] should the initial registry contents i-d be published as an RFC?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #881] remove registrant information from registry, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
    • [Ltru] Re: fix ABNF bugs, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Using RT, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #880] fix ABNF bugs, rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: clarify "i-default" and "und", Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
  • Re: [Ltru] RE: [psg.com #879] clarify "i-default" and "und", rt+ltru-registry
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organizationdeprecations, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registry initialization to IANA considerations, rt+ltru-registry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registry initialization to IANA considerations, rt+ltru-registry
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #877] move section (appendix C) on registryinitialization to IANA considerations, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantivecommentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantivecommentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what whould the format of the initial registry be?, rt+ltru-initial
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what whould the format of the initial registry be?, rt+ltru-initial
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #876] what should the format of the initial registry be?, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be madeinto an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be madeinto an internet-draft?, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents bemade into an internet-draft?, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #875] should initial registry contents be made into an internet-draft?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, John Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parent organization deprecations, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #873]: wording about grandfathered tags' canonical values inconsistent, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #872]: are grandfathered tags allowed to have canonical value?, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
    • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Using RT to view ltru issues, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Peter Constable
• RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., McDonald, Ira
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
• RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-r egistry-01, McDonald, Ira
  • Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-r egistry-01, John Cowan
• RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Misha Wolf
    • [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive commentsondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] e-GB-scouse (was: Matching metrics), Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, McDonald, Ira
• [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Misha Wolf
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Script prefixes (was: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP)), Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), McDonald, Ira
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), John Cowan
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] BCP 47 (was: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP)), Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), L.Gillam
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
    • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Frank Ellermann
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), ned . freed
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] [psg.com #892] instructions for IANA if registry becomes "too large", rt+ltru-registry
• [Ltru] Prepare for a burst of issue-tracker messages, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Prepare for a burst of issue-tracker messages, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Frank Ellermann
    • [Ltru] Case-sensitive canonicalisation, Jon Hanna
      • [Ltru] Re: Case-sensitive canonicalisation, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] cowan-03 / cowan-06 (was: John Cowan's substantive comments on draft-ietf-ltru-registry-01), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] John Cowan's substantive comments ondraft-ietf-ltru-registry-01, John Cowan
• [Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] updated editor's copies..., Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Frank Ellermann
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Scott Hollenbeck
      • [Ltru] Re: updated editor's copies..., Frank Ellermann
• RE: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re:Registry in record-jar format), Addison Phillips
• Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format), Kurt D. Zeilenga
  • Re: Compatibility with existing use (LDAP) (RE: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• [Ltru] RE: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] New registry, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] New registry, Misha Wolf
  • RE: [Ltru] New registry, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] New registry, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, L.Gillam
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Registry in record-jar format - smart matching?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: +AFs-Ltru+AF0- Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] CRLF vs. LF, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Matching metrics (was: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
    • [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Alternative matching algorithms (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • Re: [Ltru] draft review, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft review, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] draft review, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft review, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Can someone map these comments into proposals?, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] Re: Can someone map these comments into proposals?, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] draft review, Jefsey Morfin
• [Ltru] Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Frank Ellermann
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Fw: Protocol Action: 'Augmented BNF for SyntaxSpecifications: ABNF' to Draft Standard, Scott Hollenbeck
• RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format, Misha Wolf
• RE: [Ltru] Alternative matching algorithm, Misha Wolf
• [Ltru] Fw: Enforcement of Updated IPR Boilerplate, Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), Randy Presuhn
• RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags (incorporating"wiskey"), Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jarformat), Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Date of deprecation, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Date of deprecation (was: Re: Registry in record-jar format), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Jon Hanna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., McDonald, Ira
    • [Ltru] Re: Registry in RDF/XML format., Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Registry in RDF/XML format., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: is there some wiskey in the jar, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: is there some wiskey in the jar, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags (incorporating "wiskey"), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fw: RFC 4042 on UTF-9 and UTF-18 Efficient Transformation Formats ofUnicode, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, McDonald, Ira
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, McDonald, Ira
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed changes to region subtags, Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Peter Constable
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Debbie Garside
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Debbie Garside
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Addison Phillips
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, M.T. Carrasco Benitez
  • RE: [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Language transformation, Doug Ewell