ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] [LTRU]Preferred-Value for YU, CE Whitehead
  • [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (WasPreferred-Value for YU), Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Channel Islands background material (was: Re: Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 28), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 24, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 21/// E: Channel Islands and co, Lang Gérard
• Re: [Ltru] "different from" issue & other editorial decisions (was Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d ), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Mark Davis
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy on inter-locale updated, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #3: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move RFC 4645 reference to informative, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Phillips, Addison
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-21 mod: move 2860 ref to informative, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #2: move 2860 ref to informative, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] draft-21 mod: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Phillips, Addison
  • [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue Tracker, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] IPR mumbles.., Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue #3 resolution, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] issue #1 resolution[was: RE: IPR mumbles..], Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] issue #1 resolution, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Where are we?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d (was Re: Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated...), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bisi-d, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Lang Gérard
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 2, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 48, Issue 1, Lang Gérard
• [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Edith Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4646bis updated..., Edith Whitehead
    • [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #4: "different from" issue, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] change "apply", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #5: change "apply", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] change "the ones", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #6: change "the ones", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] change "than", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #4: change "than", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] change "if when", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #7: change "if when", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: "language priority list", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #8: "language priority list", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #9: record ordering instructions, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: truncation, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #10: truncation, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: use of word "response", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #11: use of word "response", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: "two authorities", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #13: "two authorities", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: primary language SHOULD, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #12: primary language SHOULD, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: change "follow" to "consult", Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #14: change "follow" to "consult", Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: uz-Zxxx example, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #15: uz-Zxxx example, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: Romanian/Modolvan example, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #16: Romanian/Modolvan example, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: relationship guarantee, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #17: relationship guarantee, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #18: reorganize 4.5 par 2 examples, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] issue: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #19: SHALL NOT vs. MUST NOT, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
  • Message not available
    • [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
      • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
  • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
    • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Leif Halvard Silli
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Gerard Meijssen
      • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] Lowercase language names and the Registry, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fwd: IAB Response to an Appeal from J-F C. Morfin dd 29 September 2008, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Fwd: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your comments on revisedproposed legend text to work-around the Pre-5378 Problem, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review andcomments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fwd: RFC Errata Update for Working Group Chairs, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: 74th IETF - Working Groups/BOF Scheduling, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: RFC 5378 Contributor License Form, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post)‏, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 5378 license forms, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Moving ahead, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Moving ahead, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73Plenary, Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post), CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Request for clarification (Was: requiring full prefixes) (I made a minor correction to my previous post), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-20.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-20: submitted., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft-20 online..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] draft 20: final nits before submission, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft 20: final nits before submission, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-5 item - car, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] minor nit on draft-20, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] updated editors copy (seeking consensus), Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] updated editors copy (seeking consensus), Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated...‏, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] editor's copy of draft-20 updated..., Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] FW: FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments�, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call commentsâ??, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments�??, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] FW: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
• Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, CE Whitehead
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, CE Whitehead
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏, Phillips, Addison
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] RE: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏‏--Off-list, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Draft-19 posted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-18 ABNF flaw, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-19.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Hand-off to AD, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] requiring full prefixes (Was: Re: Hand-off to AD), Peter Constable
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Prefix field (was: Hand-off to AD), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Prefix field (was: Hand-off to AD), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Re: 13th-hour WG Last Call comments‏ (through 2.2.1; I have additional comments on section 2, and on section 4.6; that's it so far), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Fw: RFC 4645bis: making 'pes' and 'prs' extlangs, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
  • Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), verdy_p
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [CLDR] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: Support of ISO 639 (was: Survey Tool pre-alpha), Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 13th-hour WG Last Call comments, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Fw: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissionsto IETF, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18example in 2.2.7), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in2.2.7), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18 example in2.2.7), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] In defense of private-use (was: Re: rfc4646bis-18example in2.2.7), Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 propageted subtag churn, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.7, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "SHALL NOT be rejected", Mark Davis
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 4.1 capitalization, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 CLDR example, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 CLDR example, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 5.1 URL, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 fragment in 3.4, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 fragment in 3.4, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.2 mailing list address, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.2 mailing list address, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 Latg?, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 Latg?, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 page 26 "either" lacks "or", Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 page 26 "either" lacks "or", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 broken sentence on pages 25-26, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.2 "at least one", Mark Davis
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.1, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 section 3.1.1, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 example in 2.2.7, John Cowan
• [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] rfc4646bis-18 "not suitable" prefix usage, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 4646bis-18 2.2.4 (4)(e) obfuscation, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-18.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • [Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Typo in name in draft 18, Shawn Steele
• [Ltru] draft-18 is submitted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-18 is submitted..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Calls completed, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Felix Sasaki
  • Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Broome, Karen
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Tag Analyzer, Felix Sasaki
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Lang Gérard
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Lang Gérard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 bis; IANA's Register; Languages, langage and langue, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
  • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
    • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Felix Sasaki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt --Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt --Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt -- Editorial Comments Only, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt‏, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Editor's copy: draft-4645bis-07, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy: draft-4645bis-07, Felix Sasaki
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt (editorial comment inverted noun phrase), CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, Felix Sasaki
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Felix Sasaki
      • Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt, Phillips, Addison