ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] Issue #43 (AD comment #10) section 5.1 vs 3.2 on file-date value, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
  • Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Alexey Melnikov
      • Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, Alexey Melnikov
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?, "Martin J. Dürst"
  • [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes, Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note, Mark Davis