ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[ltru List Information]
- Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt, (continued)
- [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis,
Richard Ishida
- [Ltru] Scope of ISO 3166//// Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 26,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 24,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15,
CE Whitehead
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15,
John Cowan
- [Ltru] UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Lang Gérard
- Message not available
- [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
John Cowan
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Lang Gérard
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Lang Gérard
- [Ltru] [OT] ISO 3166 private-use code elements,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] ISO 3166 private-use code elements,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] [OT] Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms,
Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Last Call for draft-4645bis?,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Prefixes (was: Re: Uniqueness of variant subtags),
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15,
Lang Gérard
[Ltru] Too fine-grained? (was: Re: Uniqueness of variant subtags),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Recent changes in ISO 639-3,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
mark
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Phillips, Addison
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Gerard Meijssen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Ltru] Last Call comments for draft-4646bis-17,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Doug Ewell
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Martin Duerst
[Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC (Was: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Standard for Unicode NFC,
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Unicity of variant subtags (Was: BCP47 Appeals process,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Ltru] Special characters (was: Re: Expanding the xx..yy ranges),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] OT: ISO 639-6 RA,
Debbie Garside
[Ltru] Fw: 73rd IETF - WG Scheduling - CUTOFF SEPT. 15,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] FW: Nomcom call for candidates,
Randy Presuhn
[Ltru] Fw: IETF Mailing List Issue,
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Ltru Digest, Vol 42, Issue 6,
Lang Gérard
[Ltru] inter-locale down...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #2,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Results of Duplicate Busters Survey #1,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] [private] Re: Registry updated,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Registry updated,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] SOT - nomcom volunteers needed,
Randy Presuhn
Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2 [rup],
ISO639-3
[Ltru] Using BCP 47 for translation information,
Felix Sasaki
[Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #2,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1 [bwo] and [bxx],
John Cowan
[Ltru] Duplicate Busters: Survey #1,
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Expanding the xx..yy ranges (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'),
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Click letters (was: Re: Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka'),
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Mark Davis
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Randy Presuhn
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Ltru] Two grandfathered tags for 'Hakka',
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] "Conditional GET" now broken on IANA HTTP server,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Doug Ewell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] [michelle.cotton at icann.org: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML],
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Ltru] obsolete grandfathered values...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] suppress-script and extlang,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] editor's copy...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Brief absence,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] registry comments on deprecated 639-1 values,
Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Duerst
- Message not available
- Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Martin Duerst
Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Mark Davis
Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Peter Constable
Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
John Cowan
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-16.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Ltru] draft-16 submitted...,
Phillips, Addison
Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement),
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Phillips, Addison
- [Ltru] OT: Latn and fonipa,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?),
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 4.1.1 wording,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale.,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] draft-16 editor copy...,
Phillips, Addison
[Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Broome, Karen
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Phillips, Addison
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (was draft updated...)),
Mark Davis
[Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness,
Mark Davis
[Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.8: typo,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.6: requirements on extensions,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.3: position of script subtag,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag",
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.2: wording,
Peter Constable
[Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Phillips, Addison
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing,
Doug Ewell
[Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation),
Doug Ewell
Mail converted by MHonArc
