ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., (continued)
  • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] section 3.5 and descriptions..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
  • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-16.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 submitted..., Martin Duerst
• Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.6: private use subtags convey... (nothing except by prior agreement), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] OT: Latn and fonipa, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Martin Hosken
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Latn and fonipa, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Martin Hosken
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.5: canonicalization and subtags mapped to Preferred-Value, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.4.1: limited buffer sizes, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.2: text in two scripts identical (?), Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.1.2: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1: sgn-US, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.1.1 wording, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] grandfathered to redundant?, John Cowan
• [Ltru] draft-16 editor copy..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Broome, Karen
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 4.1: 639-2 special cases, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.6: Preferred-Value field for extlangs, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (was draft updated...)), Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (was draft updated...)), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Possibly a way forward? (was extlang & deprecation (wasdraft updated...)), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.4: description field uniqueness, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 2.2.8: typo, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.8: typo, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax, Broome, Karen
• [Ltru] 2.2.6: requirements on extensions, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: requirements on extensions, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] 2.2.3: position of script subtag, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] 2.2.1: definition of "primary language subtag", Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] 2.2: wording, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Peter Constable
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation), John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
    • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] Remaining issues, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Remaining issues, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Bihari and Himachali (was: Re: Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Editor's copy of draft-4645bis-06, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Capitalization of "Sign Languages", Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Capitalization of "Sign Languages", John Cowan
• [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] A few points about the 4646 vs. -16 diff, John Cowan
• [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] sgn-tags with regions (was: Re: draft updated), Michael Everson
• [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] "extlangish" (was: Re: draft updated), Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Shawn Steele
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Martin Duerst
      • [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Shawn Steele
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] extlang & deprecation (was draft updated, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] draft updated, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] A thought from the IETF list, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] A thought from the IETF list, John Cowan
• Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular, Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] draft updated (was: ABNF for grandfathered/irregular), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft updated (was: ABNF for grandfathered/irregular), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF for grandfathered/irregular (was RE: Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Land Dayak languages, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale..., Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 updated on inter-locale..., Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Java regex for draft-16..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Stabilizing the order of subtag fields, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] The purpose of ABNF (was: Re: draft-15 posted...), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 2.2.8 needs overhaul, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Can we live with Draft 15?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] private-use scope and extlang..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-16 (editor's copy) posted..., Peter Constable
• [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Shawn Steele
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-15 posted..., John Cowan
• [Ltru] New content type for www.langtag.net, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] New content type for www.langtag.net, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-15.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] 'car' in different ISO 639 parts, Doug Ewell
• Re: [Ltru] Usage contexts, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using the macrolanguage tag, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using the macrolanguage tag, Peter Constable
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using themacrolanguage tag, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Section 4.1.x Tagging Macrolanguages/Using themacrolanguage tag, Peter Constable
• Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] [rt.amsl.com #7749] Mailinglist issue, Martin Duerst