ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?"), (continued)
  • [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?"), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
  • [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] FYI: Unicode 5.1 Released, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] MD48: conflicts in requirements, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] OT: GUM3C 2008 WLDC Conference Call - Call for Papers and Workshops, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] draft-13 (editor's copy) updated on inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Forward from ietf-languages (nn, no, nb), Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Debbie Garside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Elisabeth Porteneuve
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-12.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] [OT] Sorry for duplicate posting, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editorial commenets on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] draft-12 submitted..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, LB
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6--Off-list but already discussed, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] typo in "language subtag reviewer", Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Michael Everson
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] editor's copy updated and posted to inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
    • [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
  • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: archives gone missing, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] end of edits... link to diff, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] figure 3 title, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] figure 3 title, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] draft-12 edits already in place..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] charter web page problem, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] charter web page problem, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
    • [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis(long), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis(long), Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Some typos (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and4645bis, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Implementation report (Was: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] Implementation report, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Implementation report, Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] ltru mailing list test, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposed wording for 639-3 items already retired, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed wording for 639-3 items already retired, Mark Davis
• Re: [Ltru] Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
• ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
• [Ltru] Re: Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles ofOperation), Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: Excluding language subtag 'eur' (was: Re: Principles of Operation), Michael Everson
• [Ltru] Using the "eur" tag, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Jukka K. Korpela
      • RE: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, John Cowan
    • RE: [Ltru] RE: Using the "eur" tag, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] Shelta, Marion Gunn
  • [Ltru] Re: Shelta, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Draft-4645bis, as you like it, John Cowan
    • [Ltru] Message Subjects, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Mark Davis
    • [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
    • [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] source standards' dates in comment registry Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
    • RE: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Peter Constable
      • [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, John Cowan
  • [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Doug Ewell
    • [Ltru] Re: Principles of Operation, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
• [Ltru] Update of milestones, Martin Duerst
  • [Ltru] Re: Update of milestones, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: ABNF guidance, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fw: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 71st IETF Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, USA, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] ABNF guidance, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: ABNF guidance, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • RE: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Update on draft-4645bis, Addison Phillips
    • [Ltru] Re: Update on draft-4645bis, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Martin Duerst
• [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Mark Davis
  • RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Debbie Garside
    • RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • RE: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Fwd: [Ltru] Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, LB
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposed note on well-formed but not valid language tags, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] Re: Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Mark Davis
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: Addition request: alsatian, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Randy Presuhn
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicholas Shanks
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, LB
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Debbie Garside
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Peter Constable
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Doug Ewell
  • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicolas Krebs
    • [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Ltru] Re: Description on tags, not just subtags?, Nicolas Krebs
• [Ltru] Description on tags, not just subtags?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Re: Addition request: alsatian, Karen_Broome
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders—making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
      • [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders�??making subtags inclusive, John Cowan
      • [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders—making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, John Cowan
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Peter Constable
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Debbie Garside
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
      • RE: [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders-making subtags inclusive, Peter Constable
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • [Ltru] Re: Progressing beyond borders?making subtags inclusive, Nicholas Shanks
• [Ltru] Happy International Year of Languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, David McWalter
  • [Ltru] Re: MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] RE: MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag, Andy Kessler (kessler)
• [Ltru] Fwd: LTRU Milestones past due, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: LTRU Milestones past due, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Nicolas Krebs
  • RE: [Ltru] deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Re: deletion of Extended Language Subtags in draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] MUSTard in the IANA section, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] MUSTard in the IANA section, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Re: MUSTard in the IANA section, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] posted draft-11, Addison Phillips
  • [Ltru] Re: posted draft-11, Frank Ellermann
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-11.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] query: status of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-10 submission, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Re: What is EU for in locales?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • [Ltru] Vanity tags (was: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)), Frank Ellermann
      • Re: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF), Addison Phillips