ltru Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [ltru List Information]

• Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, (continued)
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, pektiong
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Arne Goetje
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Ira McDonald
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Andrew Cunningham
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Ira McDonald
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Karen_Broome
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Mark Davis
      • [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
      • Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Shawn Steele
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
  • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
      • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Extlang issues, Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
  • Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Karen_Broome
    • Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Upcoming changes to BCP47 (language tag) syntax, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] draft-4646bis, Section 4.1 (4)(4), Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Finishing up - prepare for second WG last call, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Inconsistency in descriptions in BCP 47., Mark Davis
• [Ltru] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-13.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] draft-13 submitted..., Phillips, Addison
• Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Debbie Garside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], ISO639-3
  • Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Addition to ISO 639-3: [lyg], Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, John Cowan
    • Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Fw: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Mutability of Preferred-Value?, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] fix for TP, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Fw: secdir review of draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Editorial fix, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Marion Gunn
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial fix, Marion Gunn
• [Ltru] [julian.reschke at gmx.de: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)], Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Martin Duerst
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • [Ltru] Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?"), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Issue 181, was: Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags), Julian Reschke
• [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Martin Duerst
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Phillips, Addison
  • Re: [Ltru] Last open item, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] FYI: Unicode 5.1 Released, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] MD48: conflicts in requirements, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] OT: GUM3C 2008 WLDC Conference Call - Call for Papers and Workshops, Debbie Garside
• [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] mailing list UTF-8 check, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF, plus small fix, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] draft-13 (editor's copy) updated on inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] Forward from ietf-languages (nn, no, nb), Karen_Broome
• [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Debbie Garside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6, Elisabeth Porteneuve
• [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-12.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Ltru] [OT] Sorry for duplicate posting, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editorial commenets on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial comments on draft-4646bis-12, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] draft-12 submitted..., Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 and ISO TC46, LB
• Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6--Off-list but already discussed, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] typo in "language subtag reviewer", Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Michael Everson
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
      • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived, Doug Ewell
• [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments) WAS: Regist, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Registration Forms; have we made it clear which are archived (mostly editorial comments), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only, Section 3.7, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Addison Phillips
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
    • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated..., Phillips, Addison
• [Ltru] editor's copy updated and posted to inter-locale, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] RFC4646bis-11 Editorial Comments Only Sections 3.5, 3.6, CE Whitehead
    • [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Karen_Broome
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] ABNF/3166, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
  • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] should LSRs cooperate ?, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Fw: archives gone missing, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposal to add new tags to the 'irregular' production, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] [4645bis] How to parse zh-gan?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
  • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Debbie Garside
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, LB
      • Re: [Ltru] Language Subtag Reviewer, Randy Presuhn
• [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Kent Karlsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, CE Whitehead
• Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Randy Presuhn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, CE Whitehead
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Editorial Comments Only--RFC4646bis-11, Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Updating Preferred-Value: field, Mark Davis
• [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Mark Davis
  • Re: [Ltru] Meeting in Philadelphia for IETF 71?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Peter Constable
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), CE Whitehead
• [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), CE Whitehead
  • Re: [Ltru] Extensions, Extended Language Subtags (new topic from Some typos . . .), Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Peter Constable
  • Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Editorial: wording in section 4.2, Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from 4646bis/4645bis (long), Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] WGLC: remove new region subtags from4646bis/4645bis (long), John Cowan
• [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Peter Constable
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis) MD4, Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD6 (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits MD8 (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Addison Phillips
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD11 (davis), Mark Davis
  • [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Kent Karlsson
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edit MD12 (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Proposed edits (davis), Doug Ewell
      • [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Stephane Bortzmeyer
      • Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] Keep Comments for identification, not for background (Was: Proposed edits (davis), Addison Phillips
• Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Kent Karlsson
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Peter Constable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Doug Ewell
    • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] The case against adding 'UK', Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value zh-min, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred-value of zh-cmn in draft-4645bis, Shawn Steele
• Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
      • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
      • Re: [Ltru] replacement for grandfathered items in Draft-4645bis, Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Doug Ewell
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, John Cowan
  • Re: [Ltru] preferred value of zh-hakka in Draft-4645bis, Kent Karlsson
• [Ltru] end of edits... link to diff, Addison Phillips
• [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Randy Presuhn
  • Re: [Ltru] addition of text on macrolanguages and supporting table, Peter Constable
• [Ltru] folding boundaries, Addison Phillips
  • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis
    • Re: [Ltru] folding boundaries, Mark Davis